Request a review of a public procurement procedure
UK decision to invoke Article 50 of the TEU: More information
As of 30 March 2019, all EU law will cease to apply to the UK, unless a ratified withdrawal agreement establishes another date, or the European Council and the UK decide unanimously to extend the two-year negotiation period. For more information about the legal repercussions for businesses:
If you have taken part in a public tender and feel that you have been discriminated against, or noticed irregularities in the procedure, you can request a review of the procedure or file a complaint.
Contract award decisions are reviewed by the courts or independent review bodies based in the EU country where the tender was published. You can find contact details for the appropriate institutions in the contract notice of the procedure you want to challenge.
Period for initiating a review
If you are unsuccessful in your bid, you will be notified of the award decision and the standstill period will begin.
During this waiting period of at least 10 days the contract cannot be signed. This is the period when you can initiate a review procedure.
Even if the standstill period is over, the contract cannot be awarded if there is a review in progress.
In cases when the court or review body finds the complaint founded, they may either:
- revoke the award decision
- request that certain parts of the evaluation process are repeated
- cancel the entire procedure
Public contracts awarded without public tenders
You can also request a review of a public contract that was awarded without being put to tender, if you think that a tender should have been published.
You have at least 30 calendar days (but not more than 6 months) after the publication of the contract award notice, or after you found out the contract was awarded, to inform the court or review body.
The court or review body will declare a contract ineffective, shorten it, or fine the buyer if:
- the public authority awarded a contract without prior publication of the contract notice when publication was required
- standstill period was required but not respected)
- there is evidence of discrimination against the rejected bidders