Scientific INformAtion for Policy Support in Europe
Sinapse home page

Library of scientific opinion & advice > Document description

Should you like to save, print or communicate the information related to this document, you can download this description page in a word processor compatible format.

DOCUMENT GENERAL INFORMATION

TITLE Deliberating Foresight-Knowledge for Policy and Foresight -knowledge Assessment   deliberatingforesight.pdf (328.5 KB)
Document ID LIB35
Document type Scientific position paper
Issue date 22/11/2005
Original language of the document English
Document produced by EC-Research and Innovation DG organisation visiting card
Department/Service/Committee: Rene von Schomberg, DG Research, Science and Technology Foresight Unit
Author(s) Rene Von Schomberg
Document uploaded by Rene Von Schomberg
EC-Research and Innovation DG
(22/11/2005)
Scientific domains
Policy domains
  • Communication
  • EU affairs - general
  • Science and Research

DOCUMENT TEXT

Short description  This working paper outlines deliberative procedures for invoking, applying and implementing foresight in the policy process. It offers also a methodology for assessing the quality of the knowledge to be used in policy against the background that such knowledg is derived from a variety of sources(e.g.science, stakeholders, public debate etc) and a variety of actors. (deliberative democracy) (policy)(knowledge assessment) (foresight) (decision making) (scientific uncertainty) (public participation)
Abstract (focusing on the key recommendations)  This working paper gives an overview of the way foresight knowledge concerning scientific and technological developments is deliberated in policy. It offers also an approach to assess the quality of foresight-knowledge. The paper makes a case for deliberative procedures in the science policy interface in order to ensure an adequately balanced knowledge input
Full Text
DOCUMENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This section contains additional information on the impact of the document provided by organisation which uploaded the document.
In your opinion, the scientific content of the document can be qualified as:
  • New/innovative and challenging mainstream

PAGE LOADING
Please wait...
Sinapse is currently processing your request.

This might take a few moments before the page can be displayed.
loading