Scientific INformAtion for Policy Support in Europe
Sinapse home page

Library of scientific opinion & advice > Document description

Should you like to save, print or communicate the information related to this document, you can download this description page in a word processor compatible format.

DOCUMENT GENERAL INFORMATION

TITLE The European Charter for Researchers and a Code of conduct for the recruitment of researchers   am509774CEE_EN_E4.pdf (270.2 KB)
Document ID LIB42
Document type Policy document
Issue date 11/03/2005
Document reference ISBN 92-894-9311-9
Original language of the document English
Document produced by EC-Research and Innovation DG organisation visiting card
Department/Service/Committee: DG RTD D - The Human factor, mobility, Marie Curie activities
Unit D1 - Sector Researchers' careers
Document uploaded by Stefania Bettini
EC-Research and Innovation DG
(07/12/2005)
Policy domains

DOCUMENT TEXT

Short description  “Without researchers, there is no science in Europe” said Janez Potočnik, European Commissioner for Science and Research. “That is why it is crucial to address the status of researchers. By setting out the roles and responsibilities of researchers, we are going some way to ensuring that researchers, wherever they work, are treated with the respect and esteem they deserve".

----------------------------

For further information please contact:
RTD-CHARTER@cec.eu.int
Abstract (focusing on the key recommendations)  What is a researcher?
European Commission defines roles and responsibilities

The European Commission has adopted a European Charter for Researchers and a Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers.

These two documents, addressed to researchers as well as to employers and funders in both the public and private sectors, are key elements in the European Union’s policy to make resear ...

[View the complete abstract]
Full Text
DOCUMENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This section contains additional information on the impact of the document provided by organisation which uploaded the document.
Should the document contain some recommendations, have they been followed/implemented?
  • yes
In your opinion, the scientific content of the document can be qualified as:
  • New/innovative and complementary to mainstream
If the content of the document represents stakeholders' views, please indicate of which category(ies)
  • Civil society (Public interest groups, NGOs, etc.)
  • Policy makers
  • Public actors
  • Consumers
  • Producers of goods or services

PAGE LOADING
Please wait...
Sinapse is currently processing your request.

This might take a few moments before the page can be displayed.
loading