Monitoring & Evaluation

Topic on design, management, monitoring, evaluation, accountability. If you have questions about peer review (quality support group), results oriented monitoring, project evaluation - join our groups.

Click on the icon to discover the Sector Guidance on Results and Indicators for Development

Sub-Topics:

Evaluation criteria - Evaluation methods - Evaluation policy - Evaluation uptake - Indicators - Internal Monitoring - Results framework - Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) - ROM methodology

Quality Assessment Grid (new version, April 2018)

Michaël POTAR uploaded a new Document | 12 October 2018

new_qag_template-synthesisen-final_s.pdf 879.92 KB

The quality of the final report and executive summary are assessed by the evaluation manager on the basis of this quality assessment grid (QAG). Note that this document must be completed directly in the EVAL module only.

0 0 491 457

Group: Evaluation methodological approach
RIPSEC Democratic Republic of Congo - Functional Evaluation of the Learning and Research Health districts (LRH) by the pairs

Javier Burgos updated the Information | 3 October 2018

One of the objectives of the RIPSEC program package is focussed in strengthening the Public Health Schools training capacity through the Learning and Research Health districts (LRH) creation for universal health coverage. The transformation of the health district in LRH has two phases: the first...

0 0 63

Group: Supporting Public Health Institutes Programme - SPHIP
SPHC Myanmar - Implementation of Package of Essential Non-communicable (PEN) disease interventions: a preliminary evaluation

Javier Burgos updated the Information | 3 October 2018

The effect of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) upon the individual, family and health system are increasingly important for countries around the world as they form a growing proportion of the burden of the disease. NCDs impose a heavy economic burden on the macro-economy from loss of productivity...

0 0 569

Group: Supporting Public Health Institutes Programme - SPHIP
Valentin ALVAREZ commented on a debate | 1 October 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Hello, indeed, really good interview with very clear concepts and where as says Caroline, every institution should encourage evaluations to be useful by "evaluating things that matter, in a timely and credible way, and by creating an environment that promotes learning". We are working to publish it...

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Michaël POTAR commented on a debate | 1 October 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Dear Sergio, Many thanks for your comments! Indeed, it's an important point of the interview. While I agree with your comment, I think that we must remember that the EC and IEG have a different history and organisational structure. So what is best for IEG may not always apply as such to DEVCO, and...

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Sergio OLIETE JOSA commented on a debate | 29 September 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Very relevant interview that should be also posted in the DEVCO Intranet. I retain in particular that in "an independent evaluation you report to the governing body of the institution, rather than the management" and that the IEG has a separate budget from the World Bank group. If we really believe...

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Michaël POTAR commented on a debate | 28 September 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Thanks Bartosz! Yes, please feel free to share elsewhere! Can you be sure to indicate that the Evaluation Support Service (ESS) is a service from Unit 04 Results, Evaluations and Business Process? It's a bit longer, but necessary to place our service in the broader context of DEVCO. KR, Michael

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Bartosz Brzezinski commented on a debate | 28 September 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Excellent interview! Very clear messaging and analysis. We can share a link to it on Capacity4dev's Facebook and Twitter, if you'd like.

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Michaël POTAR commented on a debate | 28 September 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Thanks Diane! Indeed, this is why evaluations must arrive in a timely manner as to be used. And at the source, before launching evaluations, we must know to which specific needs the evaluations will respond: for accountabilty reasons, visibility of EU actions, better understanding of what works and...

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development
Diane KELECOM commented on a debate | 28 September 2018

“Using evaluations to see and influence change”, an Interview with Ms. Caroline HEIDER, Director General of the IEG (WB Group)

Thank you Michael, really nice video! Evaluations are only valuable if we act accordingly with the information stemming from them - transparency is a must; and like Mrs Hieder clrearly states, summaries given through infographics or video are a great way to communicate what works and what doesn't.

Group: Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Management for Development

Experts

View more items

Monitoring & Evaluation

Sub-Topics:

Relevant Groups

Relevant Projects

Relevant Articles

Experts