| Questions |
Answer |
| Preparation and design |
|
| Has a preliminary assessment of the nature and quality of the information been carried out by the managers of the evaluation? |
|
| If not, has the evaluation team carried out such an assessment, which has been approved by the managers? |
|
| Construction of the diagram |
|
| Have the choices of objectives been clearly identified in the objectives diagram? |
|
| Is the decision-making process clearly established within the decision chain? |
|
| Does the available documentation provide information about rejected objectives and the reasons for these rejections? |
|
| Do the interviews with the authors of the documentation compensate the deficiencies of the written resources? |
|
| Do the questions of interviews logically result from the identification of both the rejected and selected objectives? |
|
| Does the temporary diagram explicitly present the results of choices (objectives selected and rejected)? |
|
| Has the test of the temporary diagram been conducted with the main stakeholders (authors, operators, partners)? |
|
| Have the findings of the test been impartially taken into account in the drawing up of the final diagram? |
|
| Has the diagram been used to properly judge the relevance of the strategy and planning, the quality of the partnership, and the 3Cs? |
|
| Has the reviewed judgement been validated by a panel composed of decisions-makers from the European Commission and independent experts? |
|
| Are the panel's conclusions accurately taken into account? |
|
European Union