Evaluation methodological approach > EN: Methodological bases and approach > Evaluation tools > Cultural and social analysis > Check list
CHECK-LIST FOR EVALUATORS
|
.
Questions |
Answer |
Preparation and design |
|
Does the bibliography include all the types of documentation? |
|
Are the questions adapted to the context? |
|
Have preliminary interviews been conducted? |
|
Are the sources of information (documentation, interview, monitoring data, direct observation) recorded in the mission reports? |
|
Implementation |
|
Have the evaluators met with the experts prior to the panel sessions? |
|
Did the panel members skills adequately cover all the topics to be studied? |
|
Were the members of the panel precisely informed about their role and of how the panel should work? |
|
Has a focus group with beneficiaries been organised? |
|
Have the evaluators been able to distinguish between personal opinions, interpretations and analyses expressed by respondents? |
|
Has the triangulation of information underpinned the development of relevant conclusions? |
|
Is the final report sufficiently understandable and explicit? |
|
Does the report distinguish the data analysed from the recommendations? |
|
.
|
CHECK-LIST FOR MANAGERS
|
.
Questions |
Answer |
Are the sources of information (documentation, interview, monitoring data, direct observation) recorded in the mission reports? |
|
Have the evaluators been able to distinguish between personal opinions, interpretations and analyses expressed by respondents? |
|
Has the triangulation of information underpinned the development of relevant conclusions? |
|
Is the final report sufficiently understandable and explicit? |
|
Does the report distinguish the data analysed from the recommendations? |
|
|