Competing fairly - Germany
Updated 11/2010
-
European Union
-
Austria
deen
-
Belgium
enfrnl
-
Bulgaria
bgen
-
Cyprus
elen
-
Czech Republic
csen
-
Denmark
daen
-
Estonia
enet
-
Finland
enfi
-
France
enfr
-
Germany
deen
-
Greece
elen
-
Hungary
enhu
-
Ireland
en
-
Italy
enit
-
Latvia
enlv
-
Lithuania
enlt
-
Luxembourg
enfr
-
Malta
en
-
Netherlands
ennl
-
Norway
enno
-
Poland
enpl
-
Portugal
enpt
-
Romania
enro
-
Slovakia
ensk
-
Slovenia
ensl
-
Spain
enes
-
Sweden
ensv
-
United Kingdom
en
Litigation
Firms can appeal against decisions taken by the cartel authorities to the relevant Higher Regional Court [Oberlandesgericht]. The Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf is responsible for decisions taken by the Federal Cartel Office; otherwise it is the Higher Regional Court with jurisdiction over the head office of the respective federal-state cartel authorities. Legal appeals against the decisions of the Higher Regional Courts can be made to theFederal Court of Justice. If appeals are lodged against anti-trust decisions in summary proceedings, the proceedings then move on to the Prosecutor’s Office of the relevant federal state.
The Centre for Protection against Unfair Competition (Wettbewerbszentrale) and the Federation of German Consumer Organisations are the two biggest national institutions in terms of implementing Germany’s laws on unfair competition. In addition, the law entitles competitors, fellow associations and Chambers of Industry and Commerce to pursue action on breaches of fair competition. The law on fair trading practices (Lauterkeitsrecht) is not implemented through official channels in relevant cases within Germany itself. When cross-border legal violations are at stake, responsibility passes to the Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL).
Legal requirements
Alongside EU competition law, national rules also ensure that competition is sustainable and fair.
In Germany, these rules are contained in the Restraint of Competition Act (GWB) and the Unfair Competition Act (UWG).
Anti-trust
Cartels, in which (competing) firms restrict competition through agreements, decisions, pacts or other coordinated practices, can take a variety of forms:
- price and condition cartels: competing firms mutually agree, for example, on selling prices, discounts, price increases, uniform delivery terms or other terms of business
- geographical and quota cartels: competing firms divide up specific markets or production and sales volumes between themselves and agree to suspend competition
There are also rationalisation, export and bidding cartels.
In principle, the Restraint of Competition Act (GWB) prohibits hardcore cartels, i.e. agreements on price, area and quotas. On the other hand, condition, cooperation and specialisation cartels may be exempt from the cartel ban if the requirements of Section 2 GWB are met. Here, firms have to assess for themselves whether their conduct is eligible for exemption (principle of self-assessment). Breaches of the cartel ban are punishable by the Federal Cartel Office or federal-state cartel authorities on its behalf and may be subject to a fine.
-
Information on national cartel and competition law
-
Federal Cartel Office information brochure (see p. 18 ff.)
[1 MB]
-
Combating cartels successfully
[1 MB]
-
Fact sheets on cartel law
Anti-trust control over dominant market positions
A variety of factors may result in a firm enjoying a dominant market position. Such a dominant position means that the firm is exposed to little or no competition pressure from other businesses.
The Restraint of Competition Act (GWB) does not prohibit market dominance as such. However, there is a danger that a firm dominating a market will impose its business targets largely as its sees fit.
Anti-trust controls over dominant market positions and, in Germany as well, over firms with a strong market presence (i.e. a strong position in relation to their customers or suppliers) are designed to stop firms not sufficiently kept in check by competition from abusing their position of dominance to the detriment of competitors or customers/suppliers and against the general interest. The following are prohibited:
- Unfair hindrance of competitors, i.e. a firm with a dominant market position denies, for example, a competing firm access to its networks and infrastructures, or attempts to oust a competitor from the market through an aggressive pricing strategy. This category also includes forced tie-ups (e.g. a product is sold only under an obligation to purchase spare parts from the same firm) and exclusivity provisions (a retailer is obliged to obtain specific products solely from the market-dominant producer).
- Exploitative conduct, i.e. a firm demands inappropriate prices or conditions from its customers or suppliers.
- Non-discrimination, i.e. competing firms may not be disadvantaged or treated differently without material reason.
-
Federal Cartel Office information brochure (see p. 36 ff.)
[1 MB]
-
Information on national cartel and competition law
Unfair commercial practices
The Unfair Competition Act (UWG) determines which unfair commercial practices against competitors, consumers or other market participants are improper.
National competition authorities
The Federal Cartel Office – together with the relevant cartel authorities in the federal states – is responsible for the protection of competition. Industry-specific decisions on cartels are taken by the Federal Cartel Office’s legal departments.
-
Federal Cartel Office
-
Federal Cartel Office: cooperation options for SMEs (fact sheet)
[170 KB]
-
Federal Cartel Office: fact sheets on mergers, contract awards and cartel law
-
Cartel offices in the federal states
The Centre for Protection against Unfair Competition and the Federation of German Consumer Organisations are the two biggest national institutions in terms of implementing Germany’s unfair competition legislation. In addition, the law entitles competitors, fellow associations and Chambers of Industry and Commerce to pursue action on breaches of fair competition. The Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL) is responsible for cross-border legal violations.
-
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
-
German Chambers of Industry and Commerce: online information
Strict provisions govern company mergers
Check also the legislation on this topic in:
-
European Union
-
Austria
deen
-
Belgium
enfrnl
-
Bulgaria
bgen
-
Cyprus
elen
-
Czech Republic
csen
-
Denmark
daen
-
Estonia
enet
-
Finland
enfi
-
France
enfr
-
Germany
deen
-
Greece
elen
-
Hungary
enhu
-
Ireland
en
-
Italy
enit
-
Latvia
enlv
-
Lithuania
enlt
-
Luxembourg
enfr
-
Malta
en
-
Netherlands
ennl
-
Norway
enno
-
Poland
enpl
-
Portugal
enpt
-
Romania
enro
-
Slovakia
ensk
-
Slovenia
ensl
-
Spain
enes
-
Sweden
ensv
-
United Kingdom
en





