MEMO/07/314
Brussels, 27 July 2007
Competition: Commission confirms sending of
Statement of Objections to Intel
The European Commission can confirm that it has
sent a Statement of Objections (SO) to Intel on 26th July 2007. The SO outlines
the Commission’s preliminary view that Intel has infringed the EC Treaty
rules on abuse of a dominant position (Article 82) with the aim of excluding its
main rival, AMD, from the x86 Computer Processing Units (CPU)
market.
In the SO, the Commission outlines its preliminary conclusion that Intel has
engaged in three types of abuse of a dominant market position. First, Intel has
provided substantial rebates to various Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)
conditional on them obtaining all or the great majority of their CPU
requirements from Intel. Secondly, in a number of instances, Intel made payments
in order to induce an OEM to either delay or cancel the launch of a product line
incorporating an AMD-based CPU. Thirdly, in the context of bids against
AMD-based products for strategic customers in the server segment of the market,
Intel has offered CPUs on average below cost.
These three types of conduct are aimed at excluding AMD, Intel's main rival,
from the market. Each of them is provisionally considered to constitute an abuse
of a dominant position in its own right. However, the Commission also considers
at this stage of its analysis that the three types of conduct reinforce each
other and are part of a single overall anti-competitive strategy.
Intel has 10 weeks to reply to the SO, and will then have the right to be
heard in an Oral Hearing. If the preliminary views expressed in the SO are
confirmed, the Commission may require Intel to cease the abuse and may impose a
fine.
Background
A Statement of Objections is a formal step in Commission antitrust
investigations in which the Commission informs the parties concerned in writing
of the objections raised against them. The addressee of a Statement of
Objections can reply in writing to the Statement of Objections, setting out all
facts known to it which are relevant to its defence against the objections
raised by the Commission. The party may also request an oral hearing to present
its comments on the case.
The Commission may then take a decision on whether conduct addressed in the
Statement of Objections is compatible or not with the EC Treaty’s
antitrust rules. Sending a Statement of Objections does not prejudge the final
outcome of the procedure.