[Graphic in PDF & Word format]
Brussels, 19 November 2004
14615/04 (Presse 321)
2618th Council Meeting
President Mr Piet Hein DONNER
OPERATIONAL POLICE COOPERATION (POLICE CHIEFS TASK FORCE) 7
MEASURES AGAINST SHIP SOURCE POLLUTION 7
EU DRUGS STRATEGY 2005-2012 9
SPECIFIC PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING THIRD-COUNTRY NATIONALS FOR PURPOSES OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH 10
IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION - Council conclusions 11
OTHER ITEMS APPROVED
Appointment of the President and the Members of the Commission 19
JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS
Terrorist financing - Council of Europe Convention * 20
Western Balkans: Fight against organised crime - Council conclusions 20
Minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status * 22
Levels of security cooperation with Switzerland and Croatia 22
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS
VAT - Germany - Expenditure on goods and services 22
ACP - Budget of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise 23
EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY
Exchange of classified information - Romania 23
EU/Ukraine – Agreement on steel products * 23
Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean - Voting rights 23
Public access to documents 24
Economic and Social Committee 24
The Governments of the Member States and the European Commission were represented as follows:
Mr Patrick DEWAEL Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for the Interior
Mr František BUBLAN Minister for the Interior
Mr Roman POLAŠEK Deputy Minister for Justice
Mr Claus GRUBE Permanent Representative
Mr Fritz Rudolf KÖRPER Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister of the Interior
Mr Margus LEIVO Minister for the Interior
Mr Manolis KEFALOGIANNIS Minister for Mercantile Marine
Mr José Antonio ALONSO SUÁREZ Minister for the Interior
Mr Pierre SELLAL Permanent Representative
Ms Anne ANDERSON Permanent Representative
Mr Rocco Antonio CANGELOSI Permanent Representative
Mr Doros THEODOROU Minister for Justice and Public Order
Mr Ēriks JĒKABSONS Minister for the Interior
Ms Vineta MUIŽNIECE Minister for Justice
Mr Virgilijus BULOVAS Minister for the Interior
Mr Vytautas MARKEVIČIUS Minister for Justice
Mr Luc FRIEDEN Minister for Justice, Minister for the Treasury and the Budget
Mr Nicolas SCHMIT Minister with responsibility for Foreign Affairs and Immigration
Mr Jóesef PETRÉTEI Minister for Justice
Mr Gabor JUHÁSZ State Secretary
Mr Tonio BORG Deputy Prime Minister, Minister for Justice and Home Affairs
Mr Johan REMKES Minister for the Interior and Kingdom Relations
Mr Piet Hein DONNER Minister for Justice
Ms Rita VERDONK Minister for Integration and Immigration
Ms Karin MIKLAUTSCH Federal Minister for Justice
Mr Pawel DAKOWSKI Deputy State Secretary, Ministry of the Interior and Administration
Mr Sylweriusz KRÓLAK Deputy State Secretary, Ministry of Justice
Mr Daniel VIEGAS SANCHEZ Minister for the Interior
Mr Paulo CASTRO RANGEL State Secretary attached to the Minister for Justice
Mr Rado BOHINC Minister for the Interior
Ms Zdenka CERAR Minister for Justice
Mr Martin PADO State Secretary at the Ministry of the Interior
Mr Kari RAJAMÄKI Minister for the Interior
Mr Thomas BODSTRÖM Minister for Justice
Ms Caroline FLINT Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office
Mr António VITORINO Member
The Council agreed on the following:
To the extent that the PCTF contributes to the planning and coordination of operational actions, it is desirable to bring the Police Chiefs Task Force, as a task force, closer to Europol.
Therefore, Europol will in principle host the relevant meetings and provide its functional support (e.g. threat analysis, specialist crime investigation support, expert support on operational debriefing etc.) .
The above meetings can be attended by (representatives of) the Police Chiefs and/or experts, depending on the level and subject of the meeting, as well as by the Commission.
Because of their strategic role with regard to European police cooperation, it is desirable that the highest representatives of the police of the Member States meet within Council structures. This will allow the discussion of strategies and issues related to structural problems and also provide a clear operational point of view in the Council's proceedings. Moreover, it will ensure the accountability of the European operational cooperation.
The Council debated the draft Framework Decision to strengthen the criminal law framework for the enforcement of the law against ship-source pollution.
The debate focused on discharges in the territorial sea of a Member State, its exclusive economic zone or equivalent zone. In the event of such discharges, and in accordance with the Presidency compromise text, a ship flying the flag of another Member State would not be considered a foreign ship within the meaning of Article 230 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and therefore in such cases persons held liable could also be subject to custodial sentences.
Other issues discussed were the relationship between the Framework Decision, MARPOL (the Convention for the prevention of pollution from ships) and UNCLOS (the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea), and the possibility of introducing a ceiling for the fines imposed on legal persons.
It should be noted that the JHA Council of 25 and 26 October 2004 discussed the text of this Framework Decision and that the Presidency noted that three Member States could not agree to the text proposed.
The fight against intentional or negligent ship-source pollution is one of the European Union's priorities. The conclusions of the Copenhagen European Council of 12 and 13 December 2002 (points 32 to 34) and the statement of the JHA Council of 19 December 2002 following the shipwreck of the tanker Prestige, in particular, express the Union's determination to adopt all the measures needed to prevent recurrences of such damage.
To that end, the Council reached a common position in June on a Directive on ship-source pollution and on the introduction of sanctions, including criminal sanctions, for pollution offences with the aim of approximating national legislation with regard to the definition of the relevant offences and commission, participation and incitement, on the one hand, and the nature, possibly criminal, of the penalties that can be imposed. It also includes technical and operational supporting measures.
With a view to supplementing those provisions, there should be approximation of, among other things, the level of penalties corresponding to the seriousness of offences in relation to the natural or legal persons who commit them or are liable for them.
The purpose of the Framework Decision that was discussed by the JHA Council is therefore to supplement the Directive agreed by the Council in June with detailed rules on criminal matters.
At the same time, provisions will be laid down to facilitate criminal investigations. Member States will be able to set up joint investigation teams with which Europol could be associated.
In addition, rules on cooperation will be laid down to ensure that offences will be prosecuted effectively. To that end, the European Union will supplement the results obtained in regional or international organisations. The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, signed by all the Member States of the Union, of which the European Community as a party, is particularly important in this context.
Each Member State will take the measures necessary to ensure that the offences referred to in the Framework Decision are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties.
The criminal penalties may be accompanied by other penalties or measures, in particular fines, or the disqualification of a natural person from engaging in an activity requiring official authorisation or approval, or founding, managing or directing a company or a foundation, where the facts having led to his or her conviction show an obvious risk that the same kind of criminal activity may be pursued again.
As regards sanctions against legal persons, each Member State will take the measures necessary to ensure that a legal person held liable is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions such as criminal or non-criminal fines, or exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent disqualification from engaging in commercial activities; being placed under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; or the obligation to adopt specific measures in order to eliminate the consequences of the offence which led to that legal person's liability.
The Council agreed on a new EU Drugs Strategy for the period 2005-2012 and will forward it to the European Council on 17 December 2004, for adoption. The framework and priorities established by the new Strategy are to serve as the basis for two consecutive four-year EU Action Plans on Drugs.
While the Strategy stresses the importance of paying due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, it also acknowledges that consistent national prosecution policies in all Member States are the condition precedent to a common and credible drug enforcement policy of the EU. The Member States will strive to make the standards of their prosecution standards consistent. Furthermore the evaluation of the functioning of the Framework Decision laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking, including its effects on international judicial cooperation in the field of illicit drug trafficking, will form an integral part of the Strategy.
The new Drugs Strategy is based first and foremost on the fundamental principles of EU law and, in every regard, upholds the founding values of the Union: respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, solidarity, the rule of law and human rights. It aims to protect and improve the well-being of society and of the individual, to protect public health, to offer a high level of security for the general public and to adopt a balanced, integrated approach to the drugs problem.
The Strategy is also based on the relevant UN conventions (the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs as amended by the 1972 protocol, the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances and the 1988 Convention against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances), which are major legal instruments in the fight against drugs. Furthermore, the 1998 UN General Assembly Special Session on Drugs confirmed the importance of the integrated and balanced approach in which supply reduction and demand reduction are mutually reinforcing elements in drugs policy.
The drugs problem is experienced primarily at local and national level, but it is a global issue that needs to be addressed in a transnational context. In this regard, action carried out at EU level plays an important role. At an overall level, EU efforts are geared towards coordination of all the actors involved. In the field of public health, the Community complements Member States' action in reducing drugs-related health damage, including information and prevention.
With regard to chemical precursors, which can be diverted into the manufacturing of illicit drugs, the EC legislation provides a framework for control of the trade in precursors both within the Community and with third countries. With regard to money laundering, Community legislation sets out a number of measures to prevent the laundering of drugs proceeds as well. In the field of justice and home affairs, cooperation between police, customs and judicial authorities is an essential element in preventing and combating drug trafficking. In this context, the adoption of the framework Decision on drugs trafficking is a major step laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of drug trafficking. Finally, in the sphere of external relations the EU takes international action with a combination of political initiatives, like the action plans and dialogue on drugs with various regions of the world, as well as assistance through development programmes.
The aim of this European Union Strategy is to add value to national strategies while respecting the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality set out in the Treaties. This Strategy stresses that Member States should consider the impact of their national strategies on other Member States, the ways in which different Member States' national strategies can be mutually supportive, and the contributions such strategies can make to achievement of the objectives of this European Union Strategy. It is also intended to allow scope for local, regional, national and transnational dynamics and potentialities and to make optimal use of the resources available. Account is also taken of the organisational and financial constraints on Member States and EU institutions.
Finally, this Strategy builds on the EU Drugs Strategy 2000-2004 and the Action Plan on Drugs 2000-2004 and has taken into consideration those texts as well as the Mid-Term Evaluation of the Action Plan, the Council's response to that Mid-Term Evaluation and the results of the Final Evaluation.
The Council adopted a general approach on the Directive on a specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for purposes of scientific research.
The draft Directive lays down the conditions for the admission of third-country researchers to the Member States for more than three months for the purpose of carrying out research projects under hosting agreements with research organisations.
According to the draft text, a researcher holding a residence permit will be entitled to the same treatment as nationals as regards:
A third-country national who has been admitted as a researcher under the Directive will also be allowed to carry out part of his/her research in another Member State.
In order to attain the keystone objective of making the European Union the most competitive and dynamic knowledge economy in the world, the Lisbon European Council in March 2000 asked the Council and the Commission, together with the Member States, where appropriate, to take the necessary "steps to remove obstacles to the mobility of researchers in Europe by 2002 and to attract and retain high-quality research talent in Europe". That desire was repeated in the Council conclusions of 26 November 2002, which called on "the Member States, in collaboration with the Commission, to strengthen the actions being undertaken to develop the European research area, in particular by: facilitating or continuing to facilitate entry and residence for researchers from third countries". That concern was also shared by the European Parliament, in particular in its Report of 9 May 2000 and a Resolution of 18 May 2000.
It has been found that the European Union will need 700 000 additional researchers by 2010 if it is to achieve the objective set by the Barcelona European Council of devoting 3% of the Member States' GDP to research and technological development by the end of the decade. As it is unlikely that the European Union will be able to produce that considerable number of researchers itself, it will also be necessary to take measures to attract researchers from outside the Union.
The Council adopted the following conclusions:
"Recalling previous European Council conclusions, with special focus on the Brussels European Council conclusions of 4/5 November 2004 on The Hague Programme and the Thessaloniki European Council conclusions of June 2003 which called upon the importance to establish common basic principles (conclusion 31), and existing developments on integration within the European context.
a. to assist Member States in formulating integration policies by offering them a simple non-binding but thoughtful guide of basic principles against which they can judge and assess their own efforts. They also can use these basic principles to set priorities and further develop their own measurable goals. It is up to the individual Member States to determine whether these principles assist them in formulation policies for other target groups for integration. The principles will be relevant both for Member States with considerable experience of substantial immigration as well as for those that more recently have become destinations for significant numbers of immigrants;
b. to serve as a basis for Member States to explore how EU, national, regional, and local authorities can interact in the development and implementation of integration policies. Furthermore, the common basic principles can also help determine how these policies can best engage other actors involved in integration (for example, social partners, NGOs, women's and migrants' organisations, businesses, and other private institutions);
c. to serve to be complementary and in full synergy with existing legislative frameworks, including the international instruments on Human Rights, Community instruments containing integration provisions, EU objectives on gender equality and non-discrimination and other EU policies;
d. to assist in structuring the regular dialogue between governments and all other relevant institutions and stakeholders at the EU-level;
e. to serve as a basis for and assist the EU to explore how existing EU-instruments related to integration can be developed further; and
f. to assist the Council to reflect upon and, over time, agree on EU-level mechanisms and policies needed to support national and local-level integration policy efforts, particularly through EU-wide learning and knowledge-sharing.
Recalling the above considerations and objectives of the common basic principles,
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES:
Establish the following common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the European Union, which will be explained individually in the Annex:
COMMON BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION:
The explanations provided are intended to give direction to the common basic principle. The description is indicative, by no means exhaustive and will be further developed in the future.
Integration is a dynamic, long-term, and continuous two-way process of mutual accommodation, not a static outcome. It demands the participation not only of immigrants and their descendants but of every resident. The integration process involves adaptation by immigrants, both men and women, who all have rights and responsibilities in relation to their new country of residence. It also involves the receiving society, which should create the opportunities for the immigrants' full economic, social, cultural, and political participation. Accordingly, Member States are encouraged to consider and involve both immigrants and national citizens in integration policy, and to communicate clearly their mutual rights and responsibilities.
Everybody resident in the EU must adapt and adhere closely to the basic values of the European Union as well as to Member State laws. The provisions and values enshrined in European Treaties serve as both baseline and compass, as they are common to the Member States. They include respect for the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law. Furthermore they include respect for the provisions of the Charter of fundamental rights of the Union, which enshrine the concepts of dignity, freedom, equality and non-discrimination, solidarity, citizen's rights, and justice.
Members States are responsible for actively assuring that all residents, including immigrants, understand, respect, benefit from, and are protected on an equal basis by the full scope of values, rights, responsibilities, and privileges established by the EU and Member State laws. Views and opinions that are not compatible with such basic values might hinder the successful integration of immigrants into their new host society and might adversely influence the society as a whole. Consequently successful integration policies and practices preventing isolation of certain groups are a way to enhance the fulfilment of respect for common European and national values.
Employment is an important way for immigrants to make a visible contribution to Member State societies and to participate in the host society. At the workplace integration of immigrants can be promoted by the recognition of qualifications acquired in another country, by training opportunities that provide skills demanded at the workplace and policies and programmes that facilitate access to jobs and the transition to work. It is also important that there are sufficient incentives and opportunities for immigrants, in particular for those with the prospect of remaining, to seek and obtain employment.
The targeting of measures to support immigrants in the European Employment Strategy is an indication of the important influence of employment on the integration process. It is important to make greater use of the European Employment Strategy and the European Social Inclusion Process, backed up by the European Social Fund (ESF), including the lessons learnt from the Equal Community Initiative to reach the Lisbon targets and to promote the combat against all forms of discrimination at the workplace. It is important that Member States, in cooperation with the social partners, pay particular attention to and undertake effective action against discrimination in the recruitment policies of employers on the grounds of ethnic origin of the candidates.
The importance of basic linguistic, historical, and civic knowledge is reflected in the increasing emphasis placed by several Member States on introductory programmes that focus on putting together the most appropriate toolkit to start the integration process. Pursuing such programmes will allow immigrants to quickly find a place in the key domains of work, housing, education, and health, and help start the longer-term process of normative adaptation to the new society.
At the same time, such programmes become strategic investments in the economic and social well-being of society as a whole. Acquiring the language and culture of the host society should be an important focus. Full respect for the immigrants' and their descendants' own language and culture should be also an important element of integration policy.
Education is an important way to prepare people to participate in society, especially for newcomers. However, lifelong learning and employability are not the only benefits of education. Transferring knowledge about the role and working of societal institutions and regulations and transmitting the norms and values that form the binding element in the functioning of society are also a crucial goal of the educational system. Education prepares people to participate better in all areas of daily life and to interact with others. Consequently, education not only has positive effects for the individual, but also for the society as a whole.
Educational arrears are easily transmitted from one generation to the next. Therefore, it is essential that special attention is given to the educational achievement of those who face difficulties within the school system. Given the critical role played by education in the integration of those who are new in a society – and especially for women and children – scholastic underachievement, early school-leaving and of all forms of migrant youth delinquency should be avoided and made priority areas for policy intervention.
If immigrants are to be allowed to participate fully within the host society, they must be treated equally and fairly and be protected from discrimination. EU law prohibits discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin in employment, education, social security, healthcare, access to goods and services, and housing.
Consequently, transparent rules, clearly articulated expectations and predictable benefits for law-abiding immigrants are prerequisites to better immigration and integration policies. Any legal exceptions to this accessibility must be legitimate and transparent.
Access also implies taking active steps to ensure that public institutions, policies, housing, and services, wherever possible, are open to immigrants. These steps need to be in accordance with the implementation of the Council Directive concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents. It is important to monitor and evaluate the success of public institutions in serving immigrants, and that adjustments are being made on an ongoing basis.
Conversely, uncertainty and unequal treatment breed disrespect for the rules and can marginalise immigrants and their families, socially and economically. The adverse implications of such marginalisation continue to be seen across generations. Restrictions on the rights and privileges of non-nationals should be transparent and be made only after consideration of the integration consequences, particularly on the descendants of immigrants.
Finally, the prospect of acquiring Member State citizenship can be an important incentive for integration.
Integration is a process that takes place primarily at the local level. The frequency and quality of private interactions and exchanges between immigrants and other residents are key elements of greater integration. There are many ways to encourage interaction. An important aspect is a greater focus on promoting the use of common forums, intercultural dialogue, spaces, and activities in which immigrants interact with other people in the host society, and on the sustained education of the host society about immigrants and immigrant cultures. Good cooperation among the different involved actors is necessary in order to stimulate these processes.
Furthermore, implementation of active anti-discrimination policies, anti- racism policies, and awareness-raising activities to promote the positive aspects of a diverse society are important in this regard.
The level of economic welfare in neighbourhoods, the feeling of safety, the condition of public spaces, and the existence of stimulating havens for immigrant children and youngsters and other living conditions are all aspects that affect the image of the people who live in these areas. In many Member States, immigrant population groups are often concentrated in poor urban areas. This does not contribute to a positive integration process. Positive interaction between immigrants and the host society and the stimulation of this interaction contribute to successful integration and are therefore needed. Therefore, improving the living environment in terms of decent housing, good health care, neighbourhood safety, and the availability of opportunities for education, voluntary work and job training is also necessary.
The cultures and religions that immigrants bring with them can facilitate greater understanding among people, ease the transition of immigrants into the new society and can enrich societies. Furthermore, the freedom to practice one's religion and culture is guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Member States have an obligation to safeguard these rights. Furthermore, EU law prohibits discrimination in employment or occupation on the grounds of religion or belief.
However, Member States also have a responsibility to ensure that cultural and religious practices do not prevent individual migrants from exercising other fundamental rights or from participating in the host society. This is particularly important as it pertains to the rights and equality of women, the rights and interests of children, and the freedom to practice or not to practice a particular religion. Constructive social, inter-cultural and inter-religious dialogue, education, thoughtful public discourse, support for cultural and religious expressions that respect national and European values, rights and laws (as opposed to expressions that violate both the letter and spirit of such values and rights), and other non-coercive measures are the preferred way of addressing issues relating to unacceptable cultural and religious practices that clash with fundamental rights. However if necessary according to the law legal coercive measures can also be needed.
Allowing immigrants a voice in the formulation of policies that directly affect them may result in policy that better serves immigrants and enhances their sense of belonging. Wherever possible, immigrants should become involved in all facets of the democratic process. Ways of stimulating this participation and generating mutual understanding could be reached by structured dialogue between immigrant groups and governments. Wherever possible, immigrants could even be involved in elections, the right to vote and joining political parties. When unequal forms of membership and levels of engagement persist for longer than is either reasonable or necessary, divisions or differences can become deeply rooted. This requires urgent attention by all Member States.
The integration of immigrants is deeply influenced by a broad array of policies that cut across institutional competencies and levels of government. In this context particularly consideration needs to be given to the impact of immigration on public services like education, social services and others, especially at the level of regional and local administrations, in order to avoid a decrease in the quality standards of these services. Accordingly, not only within Member States but also at the European level, steps are needed to ensure that the focus on integration is a mainstream consideration in policy formulation and implementation, while at the same time specifically targeted policies for integrating migrants are being developed.
Although Governments and public institutions at all levels are important actors, they are not the only ones. Integration occurs in all spheres of public and private life. Numerous non-governmental actors influence the integration process of immigrants and can have an additional value. Examples in this respect are, trade unions, businesses, employer organisations, political parties, the media, sports clubs and cultural, social and religious organisations. Cooperation, coordination and communication between all of these actors are important for effective integration policy. The involvement of both immigrant and the other people in the host society is also necessary.
Irrespective of the level of integration policy efforts, it is important to know whether these efforts are effective and make progress. Although it is a process rather than an outcome, integration can be measured and policies evaluated. Sets of integration indicators, goals, evaluation mechanisms and benchmarking can assist measuring and comparing progress, monitor trends and developments. The purpose of such evaluation is to learn from experience, a way to avoid possible failures of the past, adjust policy accordingly and showing interest for each others efforts. When Member States share information about their evaluative tools at European level and, where appropriate, develop European criteria (indicators, benchmarks) and gauges for the purposes of comparative learning, the process of knowledge-sharing will be made more effective.
The exchange of information has already proven to be useful within the National Contact Points on integration. Exchanging information provides for taking into account the different phases in which Member States find themselves in the development of their own integration policies and strategies."
Over lunch, the Presidency briefed the Council on the recent events in the Netherlands after the murder of the filmmaker Theo Van Gogh.
The EU Counter-terrorism Coordinator Gijs de Vries briefed the Council on the situation regarding several documents concerning the fight against terrorism.
It should be noted that the following documents should be submitted to it at its meeting on 17 December 2004:
- an update of the Action Plan/Roadmap,
- a progress report on the incorporation in the Council Secretariat of an intelligence capacity,
- a coherent overall approach to further strengthening of the fight against terrorist financing,
- an overall strategy to enhance the protection of critical infrastructures,
- measures aimed at enhancing civil protection,
- concrete proposals aimed at ensuring full integration of the fight against terrorism into EU external relations policy,
- an assessment of EU Counter-terrorism clauses, and
- a conceptual framework on the ESDP dimension in the fight against terrorism.
OTHER ITEMS APPROVED
The Council adopted a Decision appointing the President and the Members of the Commission of the European Communities for the period from 22 November 2004 to 31 October 2009. The Decision will take effect on 22 November 2004 (14475/04).
The following are appointed:
– as President:
Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO
– as Members:
Mr Joaquín ALMUNIA AMANN
Mr Jacques BARROT
Mr Joe BORG
Mr Stavros DIMAS
Ms Benita FERRERO-WALDNER
Mr Ján FIGEL
Ms Mariann FISCHER BOEL
Mr Franco FRATTINI
Ms Dalia GRYBAUSKAITE
Ms Danuta HÜBNER
Mr Siim KALLAS
Mr László KOVÁCS
Ms Neelie KROES
Mr Markos KYPRIANOU
Mr Peter MANDELSON
Mr Charlie McCREEVY
Mr Louis MICHEL
Mr Andris PIEBALGS
Mr Janez POTOCNIK
Ms Viviane REDING
Mr Olli REHN
Mr Vladimír ŠPIDLA
Mr Günter VERHEUGEN
Ms Margot WALLSTRÖM.
On 29 June 2004 the Council, meeting in its configuration as Heads of State or Government, nominated Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO as the person it intends to appoint as President of the Commission.
The European Parliament approved that nomination by its Resolution dated 22 July 2004.
By Decision 2004/753/EC, Euratom of 5 November 2004, which repeals and replaces Decision 2004/642/EC, Euratom, the Council adopted by common accord with the nominee for President of the Commission the list of other persons whom the Council intends to appoint as Members of the Commission.
By means of a vote held on 18 November 2004, the European Parliament gave its approval to the appointment of the President and the other Members of the Commission as a college.
The Council adopted a Common Position on the revision of the Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime (13343/04).
Within the framework of the ongoing negotiations at the Council of Europe, the Union supports the drafting of an additional Protocol to the Convention that should apply to the fight against terrorist financing and enhance cooperation in criminal matters regarding the provision of information on bank accounts.
The Council also adopted a Decision authorising the Commission to negotiate the draft additional Protocol within the framework of the deliberations of the Council of Europe Committee of Experts (14643/04).
The Council adopted the following conclusions:
"1. The Council has taken note with great interest of the Report on 'Concrete measures to be taken to enhance the fight against organised crime originating from or linked to the Western Balkans', drawn up by the Friends of the Presidency, pursuant to its mandate from the Council in its Decision of 19 February 2004 and expresses its support for and commitment to an enhanced fight against organised crime originating from or linked to the Western Balkans.
agreeing to a lead nation in every country to be in charge of organising regular national meetings for strategic and operational information exchange, taking into account the report's recommendations' in this regard;
asking the Presidency, with the support of the Council General Secretariat, to organise one regional meeting per Presidency with all LO's posted in the Western Balkans to exchange strategic and operational information;
The Council agreed on a general approach regarding the amended proposal for a Council Directive on minimum standards for granting and withdrawing refugee status (14203/04). The text of the draft Directive will be forwarded to the European Parliament for reconsultation before being adopted by the Council.
The purpose of the Directive is to set out equivalent procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status. It includes:
The Council also decided to postpone the establishment of a common list of safe countries of origin until after the adoption of the Directive, on the basis that, at present, it is not possible to reach agreement on such a list."
The Council agreed on the level of security cooperation in terms of the exchange of classified information with regard to Switzerland and Croatia.
The Council adopted a Decision extending the validity of the authorisation granted to Germany to exclude expenditure on goods and services from the right to deduct VAT when the goods and services in question are used more than 90% for the private purposes of a taxable person or of his employees, or, more generally, for non-business purposes (14274/04).
This special measure is a derogation to general rules on turnover taxes laid down in Directive 77/388/EEC.
It will apply until 31 December 2009.
The Council agreed on a draft Decision, to be forwarded to the ACP-EC Committee of Ambassadors for adoption, on the budget of the Centre for the Development of Enterprise for 2005 (2138/04).
The Council adopted a Decision approving the conclusion of an Agreement with Romania on security procedures for the exchange of classified information (12472/04).
The Council adopted a Decision approving an Agreement on trade in steel products with Ukraine for 2004 and a Regulation laying down the necessary implementing provisions, to replace the specific arrangements between the parties of the recent years for these products (13023/04 and 13027/04).
The Regulation lays down administrative and managing provisions and the quantitative limits for imports of those products.
The Agreement will be used as the basis for the negotiation of a new Agreement for 2005-2006.
The Council adopted a Decision on an amendment of a declaration by the Community on the exercise of competence and voting rights within the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (13521/04).
The declaration specifies the European Community's exclusive competence for matters dealing with conservation and management of living resources, the Member States' competence for organisational matters, and a shared competence for other subjects.
In July 2000, the European Community accepted the establishment of an autonomous budget within the framework of the Agreement establishing the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM).
The implementation of the autonomous budget implies that the Community will provide a financial contribution, which makes it necessary to adapt the declaration on competence and voting rights within that organisation. The GFCM depends entirely on the budget of the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
The Council adopted the reply to confirmatory application 26/c/01/04, the Danish, Dutch, Finnish and Swedish delegations voting against (14242/04).
The Council adopted Decisions appointing:
 This arrangement is without prejudice to either
 One or two members of Europol's staff should be permanently available to ensure, under the direction of the Presidency, the administrative support of these Task Force meetings. In addition, to ensure the coordination with the Council's proceedings, the Council Secretariat will be closely associated with these activities.