Other available languages: none
Brussels, 7 March 2012
Commission proposal on improving securities settlement in the EU and on Central Securities Depositaries – Frequently Asked Questions
1. What does the proposed regulation address?
The proposal aims to harmonise both the timing and conduct of securities settlement in Europe and the rules governing Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) which operate the infrastructures enabling settlement.
With regard to settlement, the proposal harmonises timing and discipline of securities settlement in the EU.
Regarding CSDs, it creates, for the first time at European level, a common authorisation, supervision and regulatory framework for CSDs.
2. What is settlement?
Any trade in securities on or off a trading venue is followed by a post-trade flow of processes, including for example confirmation of the trade details by a trading venue or clearing by a central counterparty (CCP), leading to the settlement of the trade, which means the delivery of securities to the buyer against the delivery of cash to the seller. Settlement may occur on the day of the trade, but more often a number of days later depending on the type of securities, the type of trading venue, or the type of market concerned.
3. What are CSDs?
The CSDs are the key institutions that operate the infrastructures (so-called securities settlement systems) that enable settlement. They are the institutions which materialise the transactions concluded on the markets. It is with them that settlement is either finalised, or fails. CSDs also ensure the maintenance of securities accounts that record how many securities have been issued by whom and each change in the holding of those securities. This is made possible by the fact that CSDs intervene on the primary market, by centralising the initial recording of newly issued securities. CSDs also play a crucial role for the financing of the economy, as in practice almost all the collateral posted by companies, banks and other institutions to raise funds flows ultimately through securities settlement systems operated by CSDs.
4. Why is the Commission proposing this legislation?
While generally safe and efficient within national borders, settlement across borders presents higher risks and costs for investors than domestic operations. Meanwhile, the importance of cross-border transactions in Europe continues to increase. It is therefore important to have a harmonised set of measures across Europe for settlement as well as for the institutions responsible for settlement, the CSDs. CSDs are currently regulated at national level and lack a common set of prudential, organisational and conduct of business standards at European level.
These problems are important and need to be solved, as cross-border transactions in Europe, ranging from usual purchases/sales of securities to collateral transfers, continue to increase and CSDs become increasingly interconnected. These trends are expected to accelerate with the advent of Target2 Securities (T2S), a project launched by the Eurosystem to provide a common technical platform for securities settlement in Europe, which is scheduled to start in 2015.
5. What is the size of the CSD market? Who are the big players?
CSDs in the EU settled approximately €920 trillion worth of transactions in 2010 and were holding almost €39 trillion of securities at the end of 2010.
There are over 30 CSDs in the EU, generally one in each country, and two 'international' CSDs (ICSDs – Clearstream Banking Luxembourg and Euroclear Bank). The ICSDs are a sub-category of CSDs specialised in the issuance of international bonds, commonly known as "Eurobonds". The two ICSDs represent about 37% of total settlement volumes in the EU.
The ICSDs form part of larger groups, which include national CSDs:
The two groups represent around 80% of total settlement volumes in the EU.
By comparison, the US market is very concentrated, with only two CSDs, one for government securities (Fedwire Securities Service), and the other for all other securities (the Depositary Trust Company (DTC).
6. What are the specific objectives of the proposal?
The main objectives of the proposal are to:
7. What is the relationship of the proposal with the Target2 Securities (T2S) project of the Eurosystem?
The objectives of the proposed Regulation are consistent with those of Target2 Securities (T2S), a project launched by the Eurosystem to create a common technical platform to support CSDs in providing borderless securities settlement services in Europe. The two initiatives are complementary: the proposed Regulation harmonises legal aspects of securities settlement and the rules for CSDs at European level, allowing T2S (http://www.ecb.int/paym/t2s/html/index.en.html) – which harmonises operational aspects of securities settlement – to achieve its goals more effectively.
8. What are the expected costs and benefits of the proposed Regulation?
In the short term, the proposed Regulation is likely to create more competition between CSDs, with expected benefits for the quality and price of cross-border services. In the medium to long term, the CSD market could become more consolidated and less fragmented. There could be less intermediation for cross-border holding of securities and CSD services, and cross-border settlement will become safer and cheaper. This would translate into lower costs for investors along the whole post trading chain.
9. What is the expected impact on growth and SMEs?
The expected reduction in the costs of holding and settling securities, especially cross-border, would benefit both issuers, by increasing their ability to raise capital, and investors, by allowing them to place their funds more efficiently. The securities market in the EU would therefore become more efficient in supporting the financing of the economy and sustainable growth. SMEs, in particular, would benefit from the expected cost reductions since the fees charged by CSDs for the issuance and custody of their securities are often proportionally higher than for larger companies.
10. What is the relationship with other legislative acts, such as the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)?
There are three main types of institutions operating securities market infrastructures:
The proposed Regulation therefore completes the regulatory framework for securities market infrastructures, alongside MiFID and EMIR.
11. Will CSDs be subject to MiFID?
CSDs may be subject to the rules of MiFID for certain services they provide, such as the provision of securities accounts and, possibly, collateral management services. It would be for the European Parliament and the Council (Member States) to decide, in the context of the current review of MiFID, whether, similarly to banks, CSDs should be exempted from certain rules of MiFID.
12. How does the draft proposal relate to the efforts to provide more convergence at international level?
Standards for CSDs, although non-binding, already exist and are currently being reviewed at international level:
The CSD proposal is consistent with these standards.
13. What about crisis management in this area?
Work regarding crisis management for financial market infrastructures, including CSDs, is ongoing at international level under the FSB umbrella. The Commission is playing an active role in this work.
14. What is dematerialisation of securities? Why is it being proposed?
Dematerialisation is the obligation for most securities to be recorded electronically, in book-entry form through a CSD, at least from the moment they are traded via an organised trading facility (i.e. non OTC market) or posted as collateral. In certain Member States, mainly in the UK and Ireland, a certain number of securities are still held directly by the investors in paper form. It takes more than three times longer to settle a transaction in paper securities than a transaction in securities held in book entry form. The key objective of dematerialisation is to ensure a quicker settlement in line with the harmonisation of the settlement periods set at a maximum of two days after the trading day (T+2) (see question below). However, currently holders of paper securities, as long as they do not sell them through a regulated trading venue, will have the possibility to keep them in paper form until 2020. The obligation for most securities to be recorded electronically does not imply that securities holders should use computers in the management of their securities.
Other benefits of this measure include:
An extensive period of time, until 1 January 2020, will be provided for market participants to record all existing paper securities in book entries.
15. Why are you proposing to reduce settlement periods to T+2?
In Europe most securities transactions are settled either two or three days after the trading day (T+2 or T+3), depending on each market. The settlement period will be harmonised in Europe and set at a maximum of two days after the trading day (T+2). A harmonised settlement period will reduce operational inefficiencies and risks for cross-border transactions, while reducing funding costs for investors (for instance, for those that have to deliver cash or securities at T+3 but can only receive them at T+2). A shorter settlement period would have an important advantage of reducing counterparty risk, that is, the period of time during which an investor runs a risk that its counterparty will default on its obligation to deliver cash or securities at the agreed settlement date.
16. What measures does the proposed Regulation provide for reducing settlement fails? How do those measures relate to those provided in other EU legislation?
The proposed Regulation will also provide for a set of strict measures to address settlement fails. In particular, market participants that fail to deliver their securities on the agreed settlement date will be subject to penalties and a buy-in procedure whereby those securities shall be bought and delivered in a timely manner to the receiving market participants. These provisions expand the scope of the measures provided in the Regulation on short selling and are consistent with those measures.
17. Why are central banks exempted from some provisions of the proposed Regulation?
Being independent institutions, central banks offering core CSD services are exempted from the licensing and supervision requirements of the proposed Regulation. However, they remain subject to its substantive provisions, in particular to prudential rules and provisions on settlement.
18. What will be the role of national authorities and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)?
CSDs will be authorised and supervised by national competent authorities specifically designated by the Member States. The national competent authorities should, however, consult and cooperate with other relevant authorities, which include the authorities from the Member States responsible for the oversight of each securities settlement system operated by CSDs and the central banks in whose accounts securities transactions are settled. Where a CSD has subsidiaries in several Member States, the proposed Regulation requires the authority responsible for the supervision of the CSD to cooperate with the authorities responsible for the supervision of its subsidiaries. This cooperation also implies immediate information of the authorities involved in case of emergency situations affecting the liquidity and stability of the financial system in any of the Member States where the CSD or its participants are established.
ESMA will have an important role in ensuring cooperation between national competent authorities and developing technical standards for the application of certain provisions of the proposed Regulation.
19. Will CSDs be able to provide services anywhere in the European Union?
The proposed Regulation will provide important opportunities for EU cross-border activities of CSDs as it will grant authorised CSDs a "passport" to provide their services in the EU without the need for further authorisation. This means also that CSD groups can consolidate their operations in a much more efficient way. Whenever a CSD provides its services in another Member State than where it is established, the competent authority of the home Member State is mainly responsible for the supervision of that CSD.
This opening up of the market for CSD services will be reinforced by the removal of the existing competitive distortions and obstacles in the functioning of the internal market. The proposed Regulation addresses the following issues:
20. What about third country CSDs? Can they provide services in the EU?
A CSD from a third country can provide its services in the EU if it is recognised by ESMA. Such recognition may be granted only when the Commission confirms that the legal and supervisory framework of that third country offers the same level of safety as the EU one, when the framework of that third country is effectively applied, when the third country recognises the EU regulatory and supervisory framework and when ESMA and third country authorities put in place cooperation arrangements to ensure that ESMA receives all the information it needs.
21. Why does the proposed Regulation require that the provision of banking services is done in another legal entity than the CSD?
CSDs are operating systemically important infrastructures for the securities and the payments markets. Their resilience needs to be strengthened in line with international efforts. Since some of them provide banking services to their participants related to the settlement service, they are exposed to more risks and, therefore, to a greater likelihood of suffering a default or being subject to severe stress with dramatic consequences for the securities and payments markets.
While these services tend to be limited to intraday lending or deposit taking, the amounts handled are very significant. The possible mitigation measures of the related credit and liquidity risks, such as for instance full collateralisation of credit and stringent liquidity measures, do not completely eliminate these risks. The requirement to provide banking services in a separate legal entity (acting as a so-called "settlement agent") would therefore prevent the spill-over of risks from the banking services to the CSD services. In addition, if the banking entity were to default, the activities of the CSD could continue, particularly if the CSD retained the IT infrastructure for settlement. Therefore, the CSD and its authorities would have more options to develop back-up solutions that enable a quick substitution of a failing settlement bank.
The costs associated with this measure do not appear disproportionate considering these important benefits. The main costs for the CSDs, which currently provide banking services, are legal/transaction costs for setting up the new legal entity. Nevertheless, if the competent national authority is satisfied that a CSD has all the necessary safeguards in place to allow it to exercise ancillary services without any risks to markets or financial stability, the competent authority may submit a reasoned request to the Commission to allow the CSD to provide banking services in the same legal entity.
Furthermore, in order to secure efficiencies from the provision of both CSD and banking services within the same group, CSDs will have the possibility to appoint as settlement agent a bank belonging to the same group as the CSD. Hence, the CSDs which wish to develop such services would not incur significant incremental costs from setting up a new entity.
22. Why does the proposed Regulation cover sanctions?
The proposed Regulation requires Member States to provide appropriate administrative sanctions and measures that can be applied to breaches of its provisions. This is necessary to deter potential breaches and to ensure that the provisions of the proposed Regulation are effectively complied with. In view of the existing divergences in the national sanctioning regimes of the Member States revealed in the Commission's Communication 'Reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial sector'1, the proposed Regulation harmonises the sanctioning powers which should be available for national competent authorities, the criteria which should be used in the determination of sanctions and the level of fines imposed. The proposed Regulation does not prevent individual Member States from fixing higher standards and does not cover criminal sanctions.
23. Next steps
The proposal now passes to the European Parliament and the Council (Member States) for negotiation and adoption under the co-decision procedure.
COM(2010) 716, 8.12.2010