Sélecteur de langues
Autres langues disponibles: FR
Brussels, 16 February 2012
Decisions of the Commission on the conformity of CAP expenditure with EU law
This regular audit procedure is a vital instrument for controlling Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) expenditure, permitting the recovery of sums paid out to Member States where these payments are not in conformity with EU rules or where weaknesses in the management and control systems of the Member State exist.
Member States are responsible for payments and recoveries in agriculture
The Member States are responsible for making practically all the payments, charging all the levies and recovering all undue payments within the framework of the EAGF (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund) and the EAFRD (European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development).
The conformity clearance procedure allows the Commission to verify, primarily by means of on-the-spot inspections, whether the Member States have made correct use of the funds placed at their disposal by the EAGF and EAFRD, in particular have well functioning management and control systems ensuring that payments to beneficiaries are regular. The Commission carries out over 100 audits each year.
The Member States have to ensure that their national paying agencies thoroughly check all claims before the aid is paid. The Member States have to have put in place an integrated administration and control system for most of the EU agricultural spending, sometimes using the most advanced techniques to check fields by aerial or satellite photography, and to cross-check claims in computer data bases. For expenditure not falling under this system, other types of controls apply.
Recovery of funds
Where, despite these efforts, the Commission finds that the control procedures in a Member State do not conform to the EU rules, it claws back the amount misspent from the Member State concerned (financial corrections). These financial corrections may include expenditure affected within a period of 24 months before the start of the procedure.
Amounts may be clawed back where anomalies or systematic failings are found. If the losses for the EU budget cannot be calculated precisely, the correction may be set at 2%, 5%, 10% or 25% of the expenditure in question, or even more. There is thus a strong incentive for the Member States to improve the quality of their control systems.
Since 1996, when the system was modified to take its present form, a total of 37 decisions have been adopted, excluding from EU financing a sum of close to EUR 8 billion. The average correction rate per financial year has been 1.5%.
Member States' right of reply and the Conciliation Body
In most cases, the Commission services go on-the-spot to verify the functioning of the administration and control systems.
The Commission then addresses its observations to the Member State concerned. There is an exchange of information between the Member State and the Commission, followed by a bilateral meeting.
Before the conformity clearance decision is taken, the procedure allows Member States to have all the significant corrections examined by a panel of independent experts (the Conciliation Body) which tries to reconcile the positions of both the Member State and the Commission.
The Commission can accept or reject the proposals formulated by the Conciliation Body. The procedure is closed by a formal Commission Decision which can be appealed by the Member State. Nowadays, it is the General Court that is competent for these matters.