Brussels, 28 February 2008
Commissioner Kovács responsible for Taxation and Customs Union said: " Non- uniform application of EU legislation across the Member States can lead to competitive advantages for operators established in some Member States. This is something that the Internal Market cannot afford. This long list of countries involved in infringement proceedings again reveals the need to simplify the VAT rules applicable to travel agents. It therefore stresses the need to restart the discussions on the 2002 Commission's proposal to simplify rules for travel agents."
The VAT Directive includes a special 'margin' scheme aimed at simplifying the application of VAT for travel agents where they sell travel packages, including services, to travellers. However, the margin scheme does not apply to travel agents who sell holiday packages to other taxable persons, in particular travel agents who resell the travel services.
In order to remove unfair competitive advantages which some travel operators benefit from as a result of on the one hand the non-application of VAT to non-EU operators selling holiday packages to EU residents and, on the other hand, an uneven application of the current rules by different Member States, the Commission proposed in 2002 to extend the current special margin scheme to cover sales to travel agents. (IP/02/264)
Unfortunately up until now discussions in the Council have not led to an agreement between the Member States on this proposal.
In order to remove the distortion of competition arising from the uneven application of the current rules, the Commission, in its role of guardian of the Treaty, had to open infringement proceedings against Portugal (2006/2547), France (2006/2548), Italy (2006/2550), Finland (2006/2551), Greece (2006/2553), Poland (2006/2544) and the Czech Republic (2006/2555). The main issue in these proceedings is the application of the special margin scheme by these Member States in cases where the customer is a taxable person that will resell the travel services. However the scheme should only apply when the customer is the traveller.
The Netherlands (2006/2546) has not introduced the special margin scheme into its VAT legislation. For instance, the Netherlands allows travel agents to opt for the normal VAT rules, whereas the special margin scheme is an obligatory scheme.
Background on the margin scheme
Without the margin scheme, a travel agent who, for example, purchases restaurant services and car rental services from third parties in other Member States and puts them together in a travel package that he sells in his own name, would be subject to VAT on the services supplied in his own Member State. He would be entitled to a refund of VAT charged abroad on the restaurant services etc. but would have the inconvenience of having to reclaim it from a Member State other than his own. Moreover, the price of the travel package would be very much influenced by the level of tax rate applied in his Member State despite the fact that the travel may take place in another Member State.
Therefore, under the margin scheme, all the elements of a single travel package are definitively taxed in the Member State where the travel takes place. The relevant tax is paid by the tour operator without the possibility to obtain input deduction or a refund. On the other hand, for the overall package he sells, he is only subject to VAT in the Member State where he is established with his profit margin (which is his value added).
Press releases on infringement proceedings in the field of taxation and the customs union can be consulted at:
The latest general information on infringement proceedings against Member States can be found at:
 Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the special scheme for travel agents, COM(2002) 64 final, OJ C 126 of 28 May 2002.