Sélecteur de langues
Chemin de navigation
IP/07/667
Brussels, 15 May 2007
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said: "Europe is fully committed to achieving its Kyoto target and to making the Emissions Trading Scheme a successful weapon for fighting climate change. Today's decision, like our previous ones, sends a strong signal of that commitment. The Commission is assessing all national plans in a consistent way to ensure equal treatment of Member States. This is how we have assessed Italy’s plan, and we will apply the same standards to the remaining plans.”
Assessment of the NAPs
Following the Commission's decisions in November 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March, April and May 2007 (IP/06/1650, IP/07/51, IP/07/136, IP/07/247, IP/07/412, IP/07/415, IP/07/459, IP/07/501 and IP/07/613), Italy's is the 21st national allocation plan (NAP) for the 2008-2012 period to be assessed by the Commission.
NAPs determine for each Member State the 'cap,' or limit, on the total amount of CO2 that installations covered by the EU ETS can emit, and specify how many CO2 emission allowances each plant will receive.
The Commission is responsible for assessing Member States' proposed NAPs against 12 allocation criteria listed in the Emissions Trading Directive.[1] The Commission may accept a plan in part or in full.
The assessment criteria seek, among other things, to ensure that plans are consistent (a) with meeting the EU's and Member States' Kyoto commitments, (b) with actual verified emissions reported in the Commission's annual progress reports, and (c) with technological potential for reducing emissions. In this context, the Commission is requiring Italy to reduce its proposed cap by 13.2 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year, to 195.8 million tonnes.
Other assessment criteria relate to non-discrimination, EU competition and state aid rules, and technical aspects. In this regard, the Commission is requiring further changes to Italy's plan concerning the following issues:
The Commission's approval of the plan will become automatic once Italy has made the appropriate changes.
See also:
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/emission.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/2nd_phase_ep.htm
Summary information on the 21 plans assessed to date:
Approved allowances for 2005-2007, verified emissions in 2005, proposed caps for 2008-2012, approved caps for 2008-2012, additional emissions covered in 2008 to 2012 and limit on the use of credits from emission-saving projects in third countries.
|
Member State
|
1st period cap
|
2005 verified emissions
|
Proposed cap 2008-2012
|
Cap allowed 2008-2012
|
Additional emissions in 2008-2012
[2]
|
JI/CDM limit 2008-2012 in %
[3]
|
|
Austria
|
33.0
|
33.4
|
32.8
|
30.7
|
0.35
|
10
|
|
Belgium
|
62.1
|
55.58[4]
|
63.3
|
58.5
|
5.0
|
8.4
|
|
Czech Rep.
|
97.6
|
82.5
|
101.9
|
86.8
|
n.a.
|
10
|
|
Estonia
|
19
|
12.62
|
24.38
|
12.72
|
0.31
|
0
|
|
France
|
156.5
|
131.3
|
132.8
|
132.8
|
5.1
|
13.5
|
|
Hungary
|
31.3
|
26.0
|
30.7
|
26.9
|
1.43
|
10
|
|
Germany
|
499
|
474
|
482
|
453.1
|
11.0
|
12
|
|
Greece
|
74.4
|
71.3
|
75.5
|
69.1
|
n.a.
|
9
|
|
Ireland
|
22.3
|
22.4
|
22.6
|
21.15
|
n.a.
|
21.91
|
|
Italy
|
223.1
|
225.5
|
209
|
195.8
|
n.k.[5]
|
14.99
|
|
Latvia
|
4.6
|
2.9
|
7.7
|
3.3
|
n.a.
|
5
|
|
Lithuania
|
12.3
|
6.6
|
16.6
|
8.8
|
0.05
|
8.9
|
|
Luxembourg
|
3.4
|
2.6
|
3.95
|
2.7
|
n.a.
|
10
|
|
Malta
|
2.9
|
1.98
|
2.96
|
2.1
|
n.a.
|
tbd
|
|
Netherlands
|
95.3
|
80.35
|
90.4
|
85.8
|
4.0
|
10
|
|
Poland
|
239.1
|
203.1
|
284.6
|
208.5
|
6.3
|
10
|
|
Slovakia
|
30.5
|
25.2
|
41.3
|
30.9
|
1.7
|
7
|
|
Slovenia
|
8.8
|
8.7
|
8.3
|
8.3
|
n.a.
|
15.76
|
|
Spain
|
174.4
|
182.9
|
152.7
|
152.3
|
6.7[6]
|
ca. 20
|
|
Sweden
|
22.9
|
19.3
|
25.2
|
22.8
|
2.0
|
10
|
|
UK
|
245.3
|
242.4[7]
|
246.2
|
246.2
|
9.5
|
8
|
|
SUM
|
2057.8
|
1910.66[8]
|
2054.92
|
1859.27
|
53.44
|
-
|
[1]. Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2004/101/EC.