Brussels, 21st March 2007
EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said: "We must ensure that fiscal measures respect EC Treaty state aid rules and do not distort competition by unfairly influencing the allocation of economic activities."
The Hungarian scheme allows companies to claim as taxable income or expenses only 50% of the balance of interest received from or paid to affiliated companies in the context of intra-group relations.
When a company based in Hungary has a positive balance of interest with its affiliated companies, only half of the interest is taxed. In turn, if the affiliated company paying the net interest is based in Hungary, it deducts only half of the amount from the taxable income. However, when the interest-paying affiliated company is located abroad, it is not subject to Hungarian tax rules. Therefore it is able to deduct the whole balance of interest paid from its taxable income.
The Commission doubts that the scheme constitutes a general tax measure. First, the Hungarian legislation excludes small companies and financial firms from the application of the measure. Moreover, the scheme is open only to groups of companies and not to individual companies. In addition, the scheme appears to be advantageous only in an international context. Finally, a company may choose to opt out on a yearly basis. Therefore, the Commission considers at this stage that the measure may confer a selective advantage to certain companies, in violation of EC Treaty state aid rules.
The Hungarian authorities introduced the scheme in 2003. As it was not put in place before 10 December 1994, listed in Hungary's Accession Treaty, or covered by the accession interim mechanism, it is not existing aid. Consequently, if the Commission's investigation concludes that the measure constitutes incompatible illegal aid, the Commission may request the recovery of the aid amount granted since the accession of Hungary to the EU.
The scheme is similar to the Dutch "Groepsrentebox" scheme, on which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure on 7 February 2007 (see IP/07/154).