Brussels, 23 October 2007
European Health Commissioner Markos Kyprianou said: "The Commission decision underlines that given the health risks linked to the use of oral tobacco, the Commission has no tolerance for allowing the placing on the market of that product. We cannot accept that the prohibition of placing of tobacco for oral use on the market is not transposed or implemented by Member States or even by parts of Member States. Only the consistent and continuous application by all Member States of all Community provisions relating to tobacco can achieve our goals in fighting tobacco."
Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC on the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products prohibits the placing of tobacco for oral use on the market. Tobacco for oral use means ‘all products for oral use, except those intended to be smoked or chewed, made wholly or partly of tobacco’. This category includes ‘snus’ – a form of moist snuff.
Member States are responsible for the correct transposition of EU legislation on their whole territory. In Finland, the Åland Islands are empowered to legislate on health matters. For this reason, the Åland Islands had to adopt their own legislation in order to comply with Directive 2001/37/EC. In 2002, as it Åland Islands had not yet transposed Article 8 of that Directive, the Commission started an infringement procedure.
In 2005, given that the Åland Islands took no measures to comply with their obligations, the Commission referred the case to the Court. On 18 May 2006 the Court concluded in its judgment in case C-343/05 that by failing to ensure transposition by Åland of Article 8 of Directive 2001/37/EC and observance on vessels registered in Finland of the prohibition on placing on the market of snuff laid down by that provision, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty and Directive 2001/37/EC.
Only in January 2007 the Åland Islands, after the opening of a second infringement procedure under Article 228 EC, adopted new legislation aiming to comply with the judgment. However, that legislation still fails to implement the above Directive because:
The Commission can only be satisfied with a ban without restrictions. It has to be stressed that the sales of 'snus' on vessels not only affect the 25.000 residents of Åland but attract also tourists from other parts of Finland or from other Member States.
In addition, both Finland and Sweden have signed and ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), and therefore have legal obligations under international law to cooperate in favour of tobacco control.
In these circumstances, the Commission considers that Finland has not complied with its obligations under Directive 2001/37/EC and with the court judgment. The Commission proposes to ask the Court to impose on Finland a lump-sum fine of over 2.029.536 € and if Finland fails to comply before the judgment, a daily penalty payment of 19.828,8 €/day.