IP/06/195
Brussels, 21 February 2006
Avian influenza confirmed in two wild birds
in Slovakia: Slovak authorities applying precautionary
measures
The Slovak authorities informed the European Commission overnight of two
confirmed cases of avian influenza virus H5 in wild birds, one tested in
Bratislava city (mergus albellus, ‘smew’ in English,
‘Harle Piette’ in French, from the family of ducks, geese and swans)
and one in Gabcikovo, district of Dunajska (a hawk). Samples will be sent to the
Community Reference Laboratory for avian influenza in Weybridge for further
tests to determine if this is the H5N1 virus.
The Slovak authorities have informed the European Commission that they are
applying the precautionary measures set out in the Commission Decision on
certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in
wild birds in the Community. This Decision was adopted by the Commission on 17
February, following a favourable opinion on 16 February by the Standing
Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. The Decision sets out the
measures to be applied in any Member State of the European Union which detects a
case of avian influenza H5 in wild birds which is suspected or confirmed to be
the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus. The Slovak authorities are in
close contact with their Hungarian and Austrian counterparts as the 10 km
surveillance zones cross the Slovak-Austrian and Slovak-Hungarian borders.
The measures consist of the establishment of a high risk area (a 3 km
protection zone) around each of the outbreaks and a surrounding surveillance
zone of 10 km (which includes the protection zone). In the protection zone,
poultry must be kept indoors, movement of poultry is banned except directly to
the slaughterhouse and the dispatch of meat outside the zone is forbidden except
where products have undergone the controls provided for in EU food controls
legislation (i.e meat sourced from healthy animals in registered farms, subject
to ante and post mortem checks by vets in the slaughterhouse). In both the
protection zone and the surveillance zone, on-farm biosecurity measures must be
strengthened, hunting of wild birds is banned and disease awareness of poultry
owners and their families must be carried out.
|