Brussels, 18 November 2002
Commission report compares EU animal welfare standards with third country trading partners deterioration to be avoided despite disparities
The European Commission today adopted a Communication to the Council and European Parliament comparing animal welfare standards in the European Union with standards in third country trading partners. The Report analyses ways to avoid potential competitive disadvantages and subsequent deterioration in animal welfare standards as a result of disparities in measures.
Since 1999 the Commission has collected information on animal welfare legislation from 73 countries that engage in trade of animals and animal products with the EU. The study shows that there is no international consensus on the role of animal welfare and the measures in place in the EU cannot be readily compared with the standards in third countries.
A key issue for the report was whether competitive disadvantages arise from disparities in animal welfare measures. The evidence available suggests that competitive distortions are most likely to arise in the more intensive forms of agricultural production, notably in the pig and poultry sectors.
Starting from the assumption that competitive distortions (whether to the advantage or disadvantage of EU producers) arising from differences in standards have the clear potential to undermine higher animal welfare, the report investigates a number of channels to prevent such a development:
The pros and cons of each path are analysed in the document with a particular focus on the implications of animal welfare as regards animal health, food safety and consumer concerns. The Report concludes that efforts must concentrate on all fronts in order to cope with the complexity of animal welfare and its ethical and cultural dimension.
The full text of the Communication is available at: