RSS
Alphabetical index
This page is available in 11 languages

Misleading and comparative advertising

European legislation regulates comparative advertising and protects consumers and those involved in commercial, industrial, craft or professional activity, and the public interest in general, against misleading advertising and its unfair consequences.

ACT

Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (codified version).

SUMMARY

This Directive repeals and codifies (i.e. consolidates) Directive 84/450/EEC and all the amendments to it in a single legal act.

Its aim is to control misleading advertising in the interests of consumers, competitors and the general public. In addition, it also lays down the conditions under which comparative advertising is permitted.

Misleading advertising

Misleading advertising is advertising which, potentially or actually, misleads or affects the judgment of the consumer or which, for these reasons, is detrimental to a competitor.

In order to determine whether advertising is misleading in nature, the following factors are taken into account:

  • the characteristics of the goods or services;
  • the price;
  • the conditions governing the supply of the goods or the provision of services;
  • the nature, qualities and rights of the advertiser.

Comparative advertising

“Comparative advertising” is defined as any advertising which explicitly or by implication identifies a competitor or goods or services offered by a competitor.

There is a need to establish criteria to determine whether a comparative advertisement is permitted since comparative advertising, when it is not misleading, can be a legitimate means of informing consumers of what is in their interest.

Comparative advertising is permitted if the following conditions are met:

  • it is not misleading;
  • it compares goods or services meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose;
  • it objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features of those goods or services, which may include price;
  • it does not create confusion in the market place between the advertiser and a competitor;
  • it does not discredit or denigrate the trade marks, trade names or other distinguishing signs of a competitor;
  • for products with designation of origin, it relates to products with the same designation;
  • it does not take unfair advantage of the trademark or other distinguishing sign of a competitor;
  • it does not present goods or services as imitations or replicas of goods or services bearing a protected trade mark or trade name.

Remedy

In order to combat misleading advertising and illicit comparative advertising, the Member States will ensure that those persons or organisations with a legitimate interest may:

  • bring a court action against such advertising;
  • bring such advertising before a competent administrative body to rule on the complaints or to institute the appropriate legal proceedings.

In this context, the Member States will give the courts or administrative bodies powers authorising them to:

  • order the withdrawal of misleading advertising or illicit comparative advertising, or institute the appropriate proceedings to that end;
  • prohibit misleading advertising or illicit comparative advertising whose publication is imminent or institute the appropriate proceedings to that end, even without proof of actual loss or damage or of intentional negligence on the part of the advertiser.

These measures may be the subject of an accelerated procedure with provisional or final effect.

The Member States may authorise their courts or administrative bodies to demand publication of:

  • the decision to withdraw the misleading advertising or illicit comparative advertising;
  • a notice of amendment.

Where these powers are exercised exclusively by an administrative authority, there must be provision for legal means of redress against any improper or unreasonable exercise of the administrative authority’s powers.

The Directive does not exclude voluntary control of misleading or comparative advertising by self-regulatory bodies if such means of redress are provided for in addition to the court or administrative proceedings.

The Member States will give the courts or administrative bodies powers enabling them, in civil or administrative proceedings, to:

  • demand, if necessary, that the advertiser provide proof of the material accuracy of the facts contained in the advertising;
  • consider facts to be inaccurate if the proof demanded is lacking or insufficient.

REFERENCES

ActEntry into forceDeadline for transposition in the Member StatesOfficial Journal

Directive 2006/114/EC [Adoption: codecision COD/2006/0070]

12.12.2007

-

OJ L 376, 27.12.06

Directive 2005/29/EC of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Directives 84/450/EEC, 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 (“Unfair Commercial Practices Directive”) [Official Journal L 149, 11.6.05].
This Directive harmonises the rules on this subject, which differ from one Member State to another, in the area of unfair commercial practices. It establishes a single, common and general ban on unfair commercial practices which distort consumers’ economic behaviour.
It lays down rules for determining whether a commercial practice is unfair and provides a short list of misleading practices which are prohibited throughout the European Union.
The two criteria used to determine whether a practice is unfair are: if the practice is contrary to the requirements of professional diligence, and if it materially distorts the economic behaviour of consumers. The Directive makes a distinction between two types of unfair practices: those which are misleading and those which are aggressive.
It also follows the strategy mapped out in the Green Paper on Consumer Policy, which harmonises the national rules on commercial practices with a view to eliminating legal obstacles to the functioning of the internal market.

For further information on this Directive, see the Commission’s Consumer Affairs website (EN).

Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 10 March 2000 on Consumer complaints in respect of distance selling and comparative advertising (Article 17 of Directive 97/7/EC on distance contracts and Article 2 of Directive 97/55/EC on comparative advertising) [COM (2000) 127 final – not published in the Official Journal].
The report came in response to the request from the European Parliament and the Council to conduct a study on the feasibility of establishing effective means to deal with consumers’ (cross-border) complaints in respect of distance selling and comparative advertising.
In its report, the Commission outlines the picture regarding consumer complaints across the EU as a whole and assesses the situation in light of the provisions contained in the EC Treaty and the initiatives concerning consumer access to justice.
Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests [Official Journal L 166, 11.6.1998].
Under this Directive it is possible to apply for an injunction against an unfair commercial practice.
Unfair commercial practices are also prohibited by Directive 2005/29/EC.

Last updated: 16.04.2008
Legal notice | About this site | Search | Contact | Top