Towards a sustainable wine sector
The detailed analysis of the common market organisation (CMO) in wine will prepare the ground for far-reaching reform in the sector. This communication takes stock of the current situation and sets out objectives for the upcoming reform.
Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 22 June 2006: "Towards a sustainable European wine sector" [COM(2006) 319 final - Not published in the Official Journal].
With this Communication, the Commission kicked off discussions on the future common market organisation (CMO) in wine, a debate culminating in the legislative proposal on the wine CMO which the Commission presented in July 2007 (see "Related Act" below).
At present, the aim of the CMO in wine is to restrict production potential by:
- limiting planting rights, the benefits of which are determined by granting additional rights and by increasing yield in certain Member States;
- permanent grubbing-up, which has almost ceased since 1996;
- restructuring and reconversion programmes focusing on adapting quality and quantity to consumer demand. These programmes encourage the production of quality wine, but may also trigger an increase in overall production.
There are also other brakes on competitiveness, in particular:
- crisis distillation of wine surpluses, now used as a structural measure, also covering quality wines. This procedure does not guarantee wine growers an adequate income and at the same time fails to limit the production of unmarketable surpluses;
- private storage aid, which has become a structural measure, the costs of which should be borne by the industry;
- the rigidity of procedures for adopting and adapting wine-making practices;
- consumer confusion caused by wine labels resulting from a complex legal system that differs from international classifications;
- additional national and regional regulations which make the situation even more complex.
THE EU'S NEW WINE POLICY
The aim of new European guidelines in the wine sector is to make the most of the EU's huge potential and to react to developments in Europe and worldwide.
Potential and weaknesses at European level
The European Union is the world's leading producer and exporter of wine. It is also the biggest consumer and importer. Moreover, in terms of quality, the EU's reputation is recognised worldwide. The wine sector therefore represents a vital economic activity in terms of employment and export revenue.
However, wine imports into the EU are now growing faster than exports, so much so that they may soon overtake exports. Due to the increase in production and sales of new world wine, European producers must boost their competitiveness.
The EU aims to increase the competitiveness of European wine producers and the reputation of their wine to recover old markets and win new ones. To this end, wine policy must be underpinned by clear, effective rules that balance supply and demand. In addition, it should preserve the best traditions of European wine production, reinforce the social fabric of many rural areas and ensure that all production is environmentally-friendly.
Options for reforming the CMO in wine
The Commission has examined the following possible options for reforming the CMO in wine:
- maintaining the status quo, with possibly some limited adjustments;
- reforming the CMO in wine along the lines of the general reform of the CAP;
- completely deregulating the wine sector.
It concluded that none of these options would provide adequate answers to the problems, needs and particularities of the wine sector.
THE ONLY POSSIBLE OPTION: MAJOR REFORM OF THE CMO IN WINE
The Commission considers this option as the most appropriate response given the particularities of the sector. The regulatory framework and the production structure will be adapted in order to give the EU a sustainable and competitive wine sector.
Two possible reform scenarios have been looked at:
- Variant A (one-step). In this case, planting rights and the grubbing-up scheme would be abolished at the same time, either immediately or on 1 August 2010 at the latest. This would provide quick answers to the present difficulties but would require a rapid and demanding adjustment of the sector.
- Variant B (two-step). This approach is based on a period of structural adjustment, including temporarily reactivating the grubbing-up scheme. The first stage would restore the market balance and the second stage would increase competitiveness, in particular by abolishing planting rights. The system of restrictions on planting rights would be extended until 2013. The least competitive producers would be encouraged to sell their planting rights swiftly, since the grubbing-up premium would be set at an attractive level for the first year and a decreasing scale would be set for following years. Competitive producers would be able to extend their production.
The agricultural area formerly used for wine production, once grubbed up, would qualify as an eligible area under the single payment scheme (SPS) and, under variant B, would be granted the average regional decoupled direct payment.
COMMON FEATURES OF VARIANTS A AND B
Abolishing market management measures
Market management measures such as crisis distillation, private storage aid and must aid would be abolished. The crisis distillation measure would be dropped or replaced by an alternative safety net mechanism using the national envelope, making way for the introduction of more forward-looking measures.
Budget envelope for wine-producing Member States
Member States would be able to use the funds granted to finance measures selected from a given menu, for example to implement certain crisis management measures such as insurance against natural disasters or to provide basic cover against income crises.
Preferably structural initiatives should be encouraged in the wine sector. To this end, a transfer of funds to rural development would be earmarked for the wine producing regions. Early retirement and agri-environment support schemes are examples of the many measures which could be part of rural development plans adopted by the Member States and that could benefit the wine sector.
Quality policy/geographical indications
The following measures should be taken to make the quality policy clearer, simpler and more transparent:
- substantially revising the current regulatory framework to align it with international rules, in particular the provisions of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The Commission proposes to establish two categories of wines: wine without a geographical indication (GI) and wine with a GI; the latter would be further divided into two sub-categories: wine with a protected geographical indication (PGI) and wine with a protected designation of origin (PDO);
- the concept of quality wine based on a geographical origin should be confirmed, adapted, promoted and enhanced worldwide;
- the role of interbranch organisations must be expanded to enable them to control and manage the quality of the wine produced in their territories.
The Commission proposes, regarding wine-making practices:
- to take on the responsibility, hitherto the task of the Council, for approving new or modifying existing wine-making practices;
- to recognise International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV) wine-making practices and assess how they can be incorporated into a Commission regulation;
- to authorise use in the EU of wine-making practices already agreed internationally for making wine to export to the destinations in question;
- to abolish the minimum natural alcohol requirement of wine which becomes redundant due to the proposed limitation on enrichment;
- to ensure a minimum level of environmental protection in the wine-making process.
A decision must be taken on must aid following the recent reform of the sugar sector, which accentuates the problem of using sugar instead of must to increase the alcohol content of wine. Completely abolishing the aid whilst banning the use of sucrose appears to be the best solution.
The Commission proposes to simplify labelling rules by setting up a single legal framework for all the different categories of wine and the particularities relating to them. In particular, it would be possible, even for table wines without GIs, to indicate the name of the variety and the year of production on the label. This framework would be tailored to the expressed needs of consumers and be more consistent with the wine quality policy.
Promotion and information
The Commission is committed to a promotion and information policy for European wine in third country markets. Within the EU, information campaigns on responsible/moderate wine consumption could also be considered.
The Commission intends to include basic environmental requirements for the wine sector. Vine growing and wine-making practices can pose problems as regards soil erosion and contamination, the use of plant health products and waste management.
The new CMO in wine should be compatible with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. Thus, current trade-distorting ("Amber Box") intervention measures will be eliminated and preference will be given to "Green Box" measures. The present ban on the vinification of imported must and on blending of Community wines with non-EU wines will be examined in the same spirit.